Rameshwar Singh @ Moti Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors
CWJC/8073/2017 · 2025-05-05
Rajiv Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98932 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98932 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8073 of 2017 ====================================================== Rameshwar Singh @ Moti Singh Son of Late Ram Prasad Singh, R/o Village- Khutauna, P.S.-Khutauna, District-Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. The Collector, Madhubani
3. The Superintedent of Police, District-Madhubani
4. The D.C.L.R., Phulparas, District Madhubani
5. The Circle Officer, Khutauna, District-Madhubani
6. The S.H.O., Khutauna Police Station ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Navnit Kumar, AC to GP-18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 05-05-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s):
“for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents authority for compliance of letter no. 466 dated 31.03.2016 issued under the signature of Respondent Circle Officer, Khutauna whereby and whereunder the learned Circle Officer fixed a date for demarcation of the land of the petitioner in terms of the order passed by the
Patna High Court CWJC No.8073 of 2017(2) dt.05-05-2025 2/2 competent authority but the same has not been yet complied with and further for issuance of any other appropriate writ/writs, order/orders, direction/directions for which the petitioner is entitled to in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
3. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent Circle Officer, Khutauna, Madhubani. Learned State counsel has taken this Court to the Annexure-B to show that the petitioner himself has given certificate that in his presence, the area has been demarcated, now he has no grievance against the respondents, certificate is dated 22.02.2018.
4. The counter affidavit was served upon the petitioner on 25.07.2019 and six years later, there is no reply/rebuttal, in that background, the matter having become infructuous.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U