Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9891 (AP)

P JOSPHINAMMA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/5558/2023 · 2025-07-20

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

s I 'APHC010110602023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY.THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 5558 OF 2023 Between: P Josphinamma, D/o Abraham, aged about 67 years, Rtd. Teacher, R/o D.No.26-17-90/1, 5th Line, Kankaragunta, Guntur, Guntur District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Dept., Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur Dist. 2. The District Collector, Palnadu district. At Narasaraopet. 3. The Thasildar, Yedlalpadu mandal, Yedlalpadu, Palnadu district. 4. Gunti Chinna Prakasam, , S/o Rosaiah, Aged about 63 years, R/o Lingaraopalem, Yedlapadu mandal, Palnadu district. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ or Order more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the respondents 2 and 3 in not act upon the petitioner's grievance made on 04-01-2023 against the 4th respondentwho made efforts to grab the assigned land admeasuring Ac.0.05 Cts in Lot No. 17, in Sy.No.20, in Lingaraopalem village H/o Maidavoiu village, Narasaroopet tq., Palnadu district granted vide Patta Dt.21.08.1969 in the name of her father is illegal, and unjust and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to conduct physical inspection and dispose the grievance letter dt.04.01.2023 made against the 4th respondent's erroneous activities over the above subject land. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to pass orders on the petitioner's representation dt.04-01-2023 pending disposal of the above W.P. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI EADARA PEDDANNA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.4: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following order: APHC010110602023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 5558/2023 Between; 1.P JOSPHINAMMA, D/O ABRAHAM, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, RTD. TEACHER, R/0 D.NO.26-17-90/1, 5TH LINE, KANKARAGUNTA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPT., SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST. 2.THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALNADU DISTRICT. AT NARASARAOPET. 3.THE THASILDAR, YEDLALPADU MANDAL, YEDLALPADU, PALNADU DISTRICT. 4.GUNTI CHINNA PRAKASAM, , S/0 ROSAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O LINGARAOPALEM, YEDLAPADU MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT{S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ or Order more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the respondents 2 and 3 in not act upon the petitioner's grievance made on 04-01-2023 against the 4th respondent who made efforts to grab the assigned land admeasuring Ac.0.05 Cts in Lot **fl No.17, in Sy.No.20, in Lingaraopalem village H/o Maidavolu village, Narasaroopet tq., Palnadu district granted vide Patta Dt.21.08.1969 in the name of her father is illegal, and unjust and consequently direct the respondents 2 and 3 to conduct physical inspection and dispose the grievance letter dt.04.01.2023 made against the 4th respondent's erroneous activities over the above subject land and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondents to pass orders on the petitioner's representation dt.04-01-2023 pending disposal of the above W.P. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.EADARA PEDDANNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission, as sought for, is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is Dismissed as Withdrawn. No costs. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous petitions, shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ^cti^Sfficer To, 1. One CC to Sri. Eadara Peddanna, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP For Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies. AL m / HIGH COURT DATED:21/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 5558 OF 2023 of if H AUG 2025 CO cgv DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS