250 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA KISHAN CHAND DECEASED THR LRS STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Ms. Sony, Advocate for Mr. Ra HARKESH MANUJA 1. Prayer in the present civil revision petition is for issuance of direction to the learned Executing Court to decide the execution application bearing EXE/ and others Vs. State of Haryana 2. Admittedly, certain land belonging to the petitioners in the revenue estates of acquired vide award dated Collector, Sonepat. 3. Feeling dissatisfied, the Reference Court, which the market value of the land acquired was assessed to be per acre. Thereafter, the petitioners/land owners filed execution application No. EXE/ 4. Learned counsel for the petition being aggrieved of the delay has filed the issuance of direction to the Executing Court concerned to decide the execution petition expeditiously, in a time bound manner. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: KISHAN CHAND DECEASED THR LRS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Ms. Sony, Advocate for Mr. Rajeev Sharma (Raju), Advocate for the **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in the present civil revision petition is for issuance of direction to the learned Executing Court to decide the execution application bearing EXE/60/2020 titled as “Krishan Chand through LRs and others Vs. State of Haryana” expeditiously Admittedly, certain land belonging to the petitioners in the revenue estates of village Rai, Tehsil and District Sonipat vide award dated 15.03.2013 passed by the Land Acquisition Sonepat. Feeling dissatisfied, the land owners filed reference before Reference Court, which was allowed vide order dated 16.10.2019 and the market value of the land acquired was assessed to be Thereafter, the petitioners/land owners filed execution application No. EXE/60/2020 before the Reference Court, Learned counsel for the petition being aggrieved of the delay has filed the issuance of direction to the Executing Court concerned to decide the execution petition expeditiously, in a time bound manner. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ARH CR-6756-2024 Date of Decision: March 26, 2025 KISHAN CHAND DECEASED THR LRS ........Petitioner ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioner. Prayer in the present civil revision petition is for issuance of direction to the learned Executing Court to decide the execution Krishan Chand through LRs expeditiously. Admittedly, certain land belonging to the petitioners, situated village Rai, Tehsil and District Sonipat was 15.03.2013 passed by the Land Acquisition the land owners filed reference before was allowed vide order dated 16.10.2019 and the market value of the land acquired was assessed to be Rs.86,60,000/- Thereafter, the petitioners/land owners filed execution before the Reference Court, Sonepat. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner being aggrieved of the delay has filed the present revision petition for issuance of direction to the Executing Court concerned to decide the execution petition expeditiously, in a time bound manner. 2024 March 26, 2025 Prayer in the present civil revision petition is for issuance of direction to the learned Executing Court to decide the execution Krishan Chand through LRs , situated was 15.03.2013 passed by the Land Acquisition the land owners filed reference before was allowed vide order dated 16.10.2019 and - Thereafter, the petitioners/land owners filed execution er submits that the petitioner present revision petition for issuance of direction to the Executing Court concerned to decide the TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.04.01 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-6756-2024 -2- 5. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 6. A perusal of record shows that execution petition filed by the petitioners on 27.01.2020, is still pending and the petitioner is waiting to get his full amount of compensation on the basis of decision dated 16.10.2019 passed by learned Addl. District Judge, Sonepat. 7. In Rahul S. Shah Vs. Jinendra Kumar Gandhi and others (2021) 6 SCC 418, the Hon’ble Supreme Court held as follow:- “That the executing Court must dispose of execution proceeding within 6 months from the date of filing which may be extended only by recording reasons in writing for such delay.” 8. In view of the aforementioned legal position, the Executing Court is requested to dispose of the execution No.EXE/60/2020 as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of next 06 months from today, as any further delay may cause serious prejudice to the rights of the petitioners-land owner. 9. It is made clear that nothing stated herein-above shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the execution proceedings. 10. The present petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms without issuance of any notice to the respondents as it may cause further delay in the proceedings. 11. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. 26.03.2025 (HARKESH MANUJA) Tejwinder JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.04.01 09:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document