Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98864 (PAT)

Ankit Kumar @ Pintu Mandal v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./24813/2025 · 2025-05-05

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24813 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-268 Year-2024 Thana- KHARIK District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Ankit Kumar @ Pintu Mandal Son of Vinay Mandal Resident of Village- Tulsipur Mandal Tola, P.S.- Kharik, District- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Lalit, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Anita Kumari, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 05-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 109, 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. According to F.I.R., on 15.11.24 at about 7:15 PM, while nephew of informant went to fetch water near his house, in the meantime, co-accused Nitish Kumar came there and assaulted on his head by means of Mathiya. Thereafter, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons including this petitioner came in front of the house of informant and started abusing and assaulting informant with lathi, danda. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Specific accusation of firing is against co-accused Nitish Kumar. So far Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24813 of 2025(2) dt.05-05-2025 2/2 this petitioner is concerned, there is general and omnibus allegation of assault against him with lathi and danda. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering backdrop of the case, nature of accusation and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail- bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Naugacchia (Bhagalpur) in connection with Kharik P. S. Case No. 268 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Navya/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T