SATYENDRA KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/33069/2025 · 2025-09-18
Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98860 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98860 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33069 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.
HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for State respondents.
2. The instant writ petition has been preferred for following reliefs:-
"A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned valuation list issued by respondent no.4 in respect of the petitioners' properties situated at Gata No.97, Village Kasenda, Tehsil Chayal, District Kaushambi, insofar as the age of the house and valuation of the property have been wrongly recorded and determined; B. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents particularly respondent no.3, District Magistrate/ Collector, Kaushambi, to re-determine the age and valuation of the petitioners' house and other appurtenant structures (including safety tank and hand pump) situated at Gata No.97, Property Unique I.D. No.16060400009001 (Pakka House), Village Kasenda, Tehsil Chayal, District Kaushambi, strictly in accordance with law and after considering the objections of the petitioners, within such time as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper;....".
3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the issue, the writ petition stands disposed of with observation that in case the petitioners make fresh representation ventilating Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Man Bahadur Singh, Sandeep Kumar, Saurabh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Satyendra Kumar And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
their grievances before the District Magistrate within one week, the same shall be considered and appropriate order shall be passed in accordance with law expeditiously but certainly after giving opportunity to all the stake holders in the matter. September 19, 2025 SP/ WRIC No. 33069 of 2025 2 (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SURYA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad