ANUJ KUMAR SRIVASTAVA v. UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/14202/2025 · 2025-09-18
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98847 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98847 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14202 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking for the following relief:-
" (1) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner for regularization on the class IV post in the respondent No.4 department, within stipulated period to be specified by this Hon'ble Court. (II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to pay the arrears of salary/honourarium along with usual interest for that post, within stipulated period to be specified by this Hon'ble Court. (III) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondents to pay the current salary month to month as is admissible to the class IV employees, within stipulated period to be specified by this Hon'ble Court."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into the merits of the case made innocuous prayer that he may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no.2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner.
3. Sri Diptiman Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 2 to 4 vehemently opposed the petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Diptiman Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 2 to 4, learned Standing Counsel and perused the contents made in the writ petition. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Singh, Vinod Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., Diptiman Singh, Ravi Prakash Singh Anuj Kumar Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner as no objection made by learned counsel for the respondents. Petitioner is
directed to file a fresh representation along with the present writ petition and certified copy of this order before respondent no.2 Registrar, University of Allahabd within 10 days. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no.2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the said representation.
6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is
disposed of. September 19, 2025 AKT WRIA No. 14202 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad