Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9884 (CHH)

SMT. GAYATRI MALEKAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/1371/2025 · 2025-04-28

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2025:CGHC:19163 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1371 of 2025 1 Smt. Gayatri Malekar W/o Late Shri Mehttar Ram Malekar Aged About 43 Years R/o Bti Road Near Zila Panchayat Quarter No. H/23 Mahasamund P.S. City Kotwali Tahsil And District - Mahasamund (C.G.) 2 Bhagyesh Malekar S/o Late Shri Mehttar Ram Malekar Aged About 15 Years (Under Guardianship Of Petitioner No. 1 ) R/o Bti Road Near Zila Panchayat Quarter No. H/23 Mahasamund P.S. City Kotwali Tahsil And District - Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department Of Home/ Police Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya P.S. And Post Rakhi Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 Director General Of Police (Dgp) Police Head Quarter (Phq) Sector - 19 P.S. And Post Rakhi Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 Additional Director General Of Police (Adgp) Office Of Adgp Administration Police Head Quarter (Phq) Sector - 19 P.S. And Post Rakhi Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 4 Inspector General Of Police (Igp) Office Of Inspector General Of Police Raipur Range Shankar Nagar Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 5 Superintendent Of Police (Sp) Office Of Superintendent Of Police Mahasamund JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.04.29 10:59:34 +0530 2 / 2 District - Mahasamund (C.G.) 6 Commandant Office Of Commandant Seven Battalion Chhattisgarh Armed Forced (Caf) Bhilai District - Durg (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Shri Abhishek Pandey, Advocate For Respondent/ State: Shri Saumitra kesharwani and Ms. Neeta Tulsani Thawani, P.L. (HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 28/04/2025 Heard. 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits the grievance has already been redressed and nothing remains to adjudicate and this writ petition has become infructuous. 2. In view of the above submission, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Jyoti