Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98816 (PNJ)

AJIT SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/26972/2025 · 2025-09-11

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

112 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-26972-2025 Date of decision: 11.09.2025 Ajit Singh and others ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Mr. Shiv Raj Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Piyush Khanna, Addl.A.G., Haryana for respondent No.1-State. Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Additional A.G., Haryana for respondents No.2 to 4. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) 1. The present civil writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents for framing an official policy similar to policy dated 23.12.2010 (Annexure P-10) made exclusively for the employees appointed in pursuant to advertisement No.8/2006 and policy dated 29.07.2019 (Annexure P-13). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he would be satisfied if the legal notice (Annexure P-21) of the petitioners is decided by respondent No.1 by passing a speaking order in a time bound manner. 3. Learned State counsel, appearing on advanced notice, submits that he has no objection in case a direction is issued to respondent No.1 for time- bound consideration and decision of the representation of the petitioners by passing a speaking order. Neha 2025.09.11 18:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-26972-2025 -2- 4. Therefore, in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, respondent No.1 is directed to consider the legal notice (Annexure P-21) of the petitioners and pass a speaking order, after affording them an opportunity to be heard, within a period of 03 months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order. Further, the decision taken thereof shall be conveyed to the petitioners. Needless to say, if the petitioners are found entitled to the relief sought, the same shall be granted forthwith by respondent No.3. 5. Disposed of, accordingly. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 11.09.2025 Neha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Neha 2025.09.11 18:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document