SEWA CORPORATE PARK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS
CWP/26515/2025 · 2025-09-08
Anupinder Singh Grewal, Deepak Manchanda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98808 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98808 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
110
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.26515 of 2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 08.09.2025
SEWA CORPORATE PARK CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
.....Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS ........Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA
Present: Mrs. Munisha Gandhi, Senior Advocate with
Mr. Viren Sibal, Advocate, Mr. Shayon Sen, Advocate and
Mr. Adarsh Kumar Dubey, Advocate for the petitioner. ****
ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral)
Learned senior counsel for the petitioner inter alia submits that the petitioner is the owner of a commercial complex, which has been developed by the private respondents. The occupation certificate had been issued on 10.04.2009 (Annexure P-3) but the completion certificate is yet to be issued. She also submits that the petitioner has sent a representation in this regard to respondent No.2 on 30.12.2024 (Annexure P-20), but no action has been taken thereon. She, therefore, submits that this petition be disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the same in a time bound manner, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
2.
Issue notice to the respondents.
3.
At the asking of the Court, Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana and Mr. Anant Kataria, DAG, Haryana, accept notice on behalf of the respondent-State and submit that the competent authority to SANDEEP KUMAR 2025.09.08 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
CWP No.26515 of 2025 (O&M) --2--
decide the matter would be the Director, Urban Local Bodies as the said commercial complex is situated within the limits of the municipal area.
4.
Be that as it may. This petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2/competent authority to consider and decide the representation dated 30.12.2024 (Annexure P-20) preferred by the petitioner after affording an opportunity of hearing to all the stake holders, including the representative of the petitioner, in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
(ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL)
JUDGE
(DEEPAK MANCHANDA)
JUDGE 08.09.2025 sandeep
Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable :
Yes/No SANDEEP KUMAR 2025.09.08 16:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.