Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9878 (RAJ)

VIKRAM KARAN AND ORS v. STATE

CW/1260/2002 · 2025-02-05

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:5177] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1260/2002 1. Vikram Karan son of Shri Vasudeo Karan, aged about 25 years, resident of Natwara House, Purana Amer Road, Subhash Chowk, Jaipur. 2. Rohit Singh son of Shri Joravar Singh, aged about 25 years, resident of 405, Hanuman Nagar Vistar, Khatipur, Jaipur 3. Jwala Pratap Singh son of Shri Shakti Singh, aged about 25 years, resident of B-220, Kirti Nagar Tonk Phatak, Jaipur. 4. V. P. Singh son of Shri Hanuvant Singh, aged about 22 years, resident of near Maharani Farm, Durgapura, Jaipur. 5. Narender Singh Shekhawat son of Shri Bhan Singh, aged about 22 years, resident of A-507, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur. 6. Dharmesh Singh Kandhal son of Shri Rajender Singh Kandhal, aged about 22 years, resident of Karanpura House, Civil Lines, Jaipur. 7. Ranjeet Singh Shekhawat son of Shri Rati Pal Singh Shekhawat, aged about 22 years, resident of 18/213, Rserve Bank of India Colony, Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Rajasthan Public Service Commission through its Secretary, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Krishna Soni for Mr. Vinod Kumar Gupta, AGC Mr. Dilip Singh Shekhawat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 05/02/2025 Matter pertains to the year 2002. On perusal of the Court file, it is noted that no active steps are taken to contest the matter. Today, when the matter was called, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:5177] (2 of 2) [CW-1260/2002] Learned counsel for the respondents has apprised this Court that recruitment process is concluded and thereafter, fresh recruitment process has been initiated. Therefore the present petition is rendered as infructuous. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in default. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Diksha Mishra/10