1 2025:CGHC:46890 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 326 of 2020 1. Sumeet Thawani S/o Girish Thawani, Aged About 30 Years R/o 38/7, Kushabhau Thakre Parishar, Infront Of Block No. 2, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Girish Thawani S/o G. L. Das Thawani, Aged About 56 Years R/o 38/7, Kushabhau Thakre Parishar, Infront Of Block No. 2, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Rekha Thawani W/o Girish Thawani, Aged About 52 Years R/o 38/7, Kushabhau Thakre Parishar, Infront Of Block No. 2, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Gunjan Thawani S/o Girish Thawani, Aged About 27 Years R/o 38/7, Kushabhau Thakre Parishar, Infront Of Block No. 2, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Applicants versus Smt. Neha Mandhani W/o Sumit Thawani, Aged About 30 Years 38/7, Kusabhau Thakre Parishar, Near Block No. 2, New Rajendra Nagar, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.), At Present R/o Matadevalaya Ward, Bhatapara, Tahsil Bhatapara, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent For Applicants : None. For Respondent : Mr. Varun Sharma, Advocate. PREETI KUMARI Digitally signed by PREETI KUMARI Date: 2025.09.15 18:24:52 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 12.09.2025 1. The present revision has been filed with a following prayers:- “It is therefore, respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside the impugned judgement dated 07.02.2020, passed by the court of Additional Session Judge, Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, presiding officer Satyendra Kumar Sahu, titled as Smt. Neha Mandhani Vs. Sumit Thawani & others, passed in Criminal Appeal No. H-53/2019 so for as enhancement of maintenance amount of Rs. 3000/- in favour of respondent is concern, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the revisionist/applicant submits that the present revision has become infructuous, as the order passed under the Domestic Violence Act has become final against the applicant. 3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicant, the present revision is dismissed as infructuous. 4. Let a certified copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Preeti