HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33004 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for State. 2. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions received, stated that an FIR has been lodged in the instant case, which was registered as Case Crime No.368 of 2025, under Section 87/351(2) BNS, Police Station Mau, District Prayagraj, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. September 19, 2025 Shaswat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rewti Raman Patel Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Smt Priti And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad