Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98767 (ALL)

SMT. RAHANUMA @ MUSKAN AND ANOTHER v. State of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/31592/2024 · 2025-03-04

Vinod Diwakar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 76 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 31592 of 2024 Petitioner :- Smt. Rahanuma @ Muskan And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pratibha Vohra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J. 1. In compliance of the order dated 17.02.2025, the petitioner no.1-Smt. Rahanuma @ Muskan and petitioner no.2-Shri Sachin Kumar, are present before the Court, duly identified by Shri Arun Kumar Giri, Sub Inspector, Police Station Saidnagali, District Amroha. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking protection from the police as they have solemnized marriage against the wishes of their parents. 3. Shri Ashwani Kumar Tripathi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions, states that the petitioners have concealed the material facts that they have approached this Court seeking protection by means of Writ-C No.33766 of 2024 (Rahanuma and another vs. State of U.P. and 3 others), which was dismissed with cost of Rs.25,000/- vide order dated 05.12.2024 and again the petitioners have approached this Court for the same relief, therefore, the instant writ petition for the same relief is not maintainable. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel further states that as per information gathered by him, the petitioners have not deposited the cost imposed upon them in earlier writ petition, therefore, requests that the petitioners may be directed to deposit the cost, so that, they may not dare to file such type of frivolous writ petition in near future. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid facts. 5. Since the petitioners have approached this Court seeking protection from the police by concealing the material fact of filing earlier writ petition for the same relief, the instant writ petition is dismissed. However, the petitioners are directed to deposit the cost of Rs.25,000/- imposed upon them vide order dated 05.12.2024 passed in Writ - C No. 33766 of 2024 (Rahanuma and another vs. State of U.P. and 3 others) before the District Legal Services Authority within thirty days from today, failing which, the District Magistrate, Amroha is directed to recover the said amount from the petitioners as arrears of land revenue. The District Magistrate concerned shall submit its report before the CJM concerned. Thereafter the CJM shall submit its report to this Court to be kept on record of this writ petition. 6. Let a copy of this order be sent to the District Magistrate, Amroha and Chief Judicial Magistrate, Amroha for information and compliance. 7. The personal appearance of both the petitioners are hereby exempted till further orders unless specifically called for in some other case. Order Date :- 5.3.2025 Prajapati Justice Vinod Diwakar Digitally signed by :- RAMKESH PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad