KULDEEP SHUKLA AND AND 149 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/14375/2025 · 2025-09-22
Manju Rani Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98759 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98759 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14375 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no. 1, Sri Lal Mani Tripathi, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Girijesh Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3, and perused the record. The petitioners, who are 150 in number, have preferred instant writ petition for a direction upon respondent no. 3 - District Basic Education Officer, Shahjahanpur, to pay salary to the petitioners for the post of Headmaster and pay arrears as they have been performing duties of Headmaster in respective schools.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that for ventilation of their grievances, the petitioners have approached the authority concerned by moving representations. However, despite several representations moved by the petitioners, no heed has yet been paid.
Learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3 submits that the controversy regarding payment of the aforesaid has already been settled by the Division Bench of this Court in Special Appeal No.652 of 2024 (Secretary, U.P. Basic Education Board and 2 Others vs. Tripurari Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravi Prakash Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Girijesh Kumar Tripathi Kuldeep Shukla And And 149 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
Dubey and 3 Others) decided on 30.04.2025. The aforesaid order has been affirmed by the Apex Court by dismissal of the Special Leave to Appeal, vide order dated 13.08.2025 in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 22427 of 2025. However, he submits that in case a fresh representation is given by the petitioners individually before the respondent no.3, the same may be decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioners, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioners may make fresh application/representation, individually, ventilating all their grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.3 - District Basic Education Officer, District Shahjahanpur, within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.3 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, keeping in mind the directions issued in Tripurari Dubey (supra), by means of a reasoned and speaking
order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 23, 2025 DS WRIA No. 14375 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIGAMBER SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- DIGAMBER SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad