[2025:RJ-JP:13424] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4112/2025 Naresh Chandra S/o Maniram, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Village Sithal, Tehsil Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) Retd. Teacher Grade-Iii Level-I (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner (Raj.) 3. District Education Officer (H.Q.), Secondary Education, Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 4. Principal, Shahid Khadag Singh, Govt. Sr. Secondary School, Nangali Gujran Block Udaipurwati District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Mehla Ms. Sunita Mehla For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 25/03/2025 1. A limited prayer has been made in this petition for issuing a direction to the respondents to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner for redressal of his grievance. 2. The Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Pawan Meena Versus State of Rajasthan in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024 decided on 02.02.2024, has held that whenever a representation is submitted by an aggrieved person, it is expected from the authorities concerned to decide the same by passing a reasoned and speaking order. [2025:RJ-JP:13424] (2 of 2) [CW-4112/2025] 3. The instant writ petition stands disposed of with direction to the respondents to decide the representation (pending, if any) expeditiously, as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. Stay application and all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of. 5. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any direction/order to the respondents to decide the representation in a particular way. The respondents would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J GARIMA /5