Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98717 (MAD)

State Government v. Yusuffkhan @ Pappu and others

SUO MOTU TR/10426/2025 · 2025-10-07

D Bharatha Chakravarthy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Suo Motu TR.No.10426 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07.10.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY Suo Motu TR.No.10426 of 2025 (PRC.No.800019 of 2009 Judicial Magistrate No.II, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishanagiri) State rep by The Inspector of Police, Krishnagiri Rural Circle, Krishnagiri District. ... Petitioner Vs. 1 Yusuf Khan @ pappu 2 Chowter 3 Balbir @ Bablu 4 Vasim Ahmed 5 Khayyaum @ Nazish Ahamed ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Govt. Advocate(Crl.Side) ORDER This Suo Motu Case is dealt with in an extraordinary manner by the Dedicated Bench, pursuant to Suo Motu W.P.(Crl.) No.618 of 2025. Page No.1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Suo Motu TR.No.10426 of 2025 2.The case in PRC.No.19 of 2009 was taken on the file of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishanagiri for the alleged offence under Sections 450, 395, read with 397 read with 394, 342 of IPC and Section 27 of Arms Act. There are totally seven accused in this case. As a matter of fact, A1 and A2 are apprehended and they went into trial and were convicted in S.C.No.174 of 2008. As far as the other accused are concerned, the warrant could not be exeucted. 3.Considering the factual matrix, context of the case, the background of the accused, the reason for absence from her usual place, and the submission that, despite best efforts, the warrant could not be executed and the matter is pending for the past 23 years. In view thereof, this is a case, which requires exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution of India and accordingly, the PRC.NO.19 of 2009 shall stand closed. However, with liberty to the prosecution to reopen and conduct the case if there is any clue against the accused and if the accused resurfaces in future. Page No.2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Suo Motu TR.No.10426 of 2025 4.Accordingly, the case in PRC.No.19 of 2009 of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishanagiri stands closed. This Suo Motu Transfer Case is closed. 07.10.2025 mp Note to the Trial Court: This order is digitally signed and communicated electronically alone. The Trial Court shall take note of the order and accordingly classify the case pending before them as allowed / dismissed / disposed of, etc, and while doing so, consider any applications such as disposal of properties, etc., and pass appropriate orders, as may be necessary. Further, the Court below is directed to dispatch the copy of this order to all concerned. Page No.3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Suo Motu TR.No.10426 of 2025 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. mp Suo Motu TR.No.10426 of 2025 07.10.2025 Page No.4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis