Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98708 (ALL)

AMIT v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/32732/2025 · 2025-09-22

Krishan Pahal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32732 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Rajendra Prasad Singh, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 214 of 2025, under Section 18/20/29 of The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station- Kutubsher, District Saharanpur, during the pendency of trial. 4. As per the allegations of the FIR, 44.4 Kg. of Poppy Straw is said to have been recovered from the possession of the applicant by the police on 12.07.2025 at about 10:57 p.m. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with a view to cause unnecessary harassment and to victimize him. The said contraband is below the commercial quantity. There is no report of the chemical analyst to corroborate the allegations that the alleged contraband is Poppy Straw. There is no compliance of mandatory provision of Section 52A of the N.D.P.S. Act. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 12.07.2025. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 6. Learned State Law Officer has vehemently opposed the bail application. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amit .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, perusal of record and considering the complicity of accused, severity of punishment as well as totality of facts and circumstances, at this stage without commenting on the merits of the case, prima facie, I find it a fit case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant- Amit, who is involved in aforementioned case be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 9. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 10. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. September 23, 2025 (Ravi Kant) BAIL No. 32732 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad