HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14200 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Since the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 19.05.2025 passed by respondent no.3 it is non disputed by the petitioner that selection had also taken place at the end of respondent no.3. 3. Accordingly, Sri R.K. Singh Kaosik, learned counsel for the respondents has raised preliminary objection as to the maintainability of this petition before this Court. He has also relied upon a Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Amit Kumar Yadav v. Union of India and 4 others vide Writ C No14651 of 2025 decided on 16.09.2025. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the legal position emerging out from the judgment of the Division Bench inasmuch as the relief claimed is against respondent no.3 who is in Bangaluru which falls within the territorial jurisdiction of Karnataka High Court. 5. In view of the above, I decline to grant indulgence Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahendra Pratap Yadav, Sanjai Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., R. K. Singh Kaosik Anil Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) in the matter. Liberty rest with the petitioner to apply before the High Court having territorial jurisdiction. 6. Subject to the aforesaid liberty, this petition is consigned to records. September 19, 2025 Deepika WRIA No. 14200 of 2025 2 (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad