IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19162 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1. Jagnarayan Ram @ Jag Narayan Baitha S/o Radha Baitha R/o vill - Basahi, P.S.- Kudra, Distt.- Kaimur at Bhabhua 2. Champa Devi W/o Jagnarayan Ram @ Jag Narayan Baitha R/o vill - Basahi, P.S.- Kudra, Distt.- Kaimur at Bhabhua 3. Raju Kumar S/o Jagnarayan Ram @ Jag Narayan Baitha R/o vill - Basahi, P.S.- Kudra, Distt.- Kaimur at Bhabhua 4. Banty Kumar S/o Jagnarayan Ram @ Jag Narayan Baitha R/o vill - Basahi, P.S.- Kudra, Distt.- Kaimur at Bhabhua 5. Roushan Kumar @ Roushan Baitha S/o Jagnarayan Ram @ Jag Narayan Baitha R/o vill - Basahi, P.S.- Kudra, Distt.- Kaimur at Bhabhua 6. Gudiya Devi W/o Roushan Kumar R/o vill - Basahi, P.S.- Kudra, Distt.- Kaimur at Bhabhua ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Khusbu Kumari W/o Rahul Ram @ Bhuwar R/o vill - Basahi, P.S.- Kudra, Distt.- Kaimur at Bhabhua ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshanand Pandit,APP Mr. Ravindra Kumar,Adv.for OP-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 05-05-2025 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, State and informant/opposite party no. 2. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 85, 115(2), 117(2), 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19162 of 2025(3) dt.05-05-2025 2/3 3. Allegation against petitioners is of commission of torture and cruelty to the informant/opposite party no. 2 for dowry. 4. Petitioner no. 1 is father-in-law, petitioner no. 2 is mother-in-law, petitioner nos. 3, 4 and 5 are brother-in-law and petitioner no. 6 is sister-in-law (xksruh) of the informant/opposite party no. 2. Allegation is general and omnibus. Thrust of the accusation is against husband of the opposite party no. 2. Petitioners are separate in mess and property and have got no concern with the family affairs of informant and her husband. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned counsel for State and informant opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners. 6. However, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is allowed. Let the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Bhabhua, Kaimur in connection with Mahila (Bhabhua) P.S. Case No. 67 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19162 of 2025(3) dt.05-05-2025 3/3 Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T