IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 206 Delhi Fransalian Society through its Secretary Father Anil George Vikas Gupta (IAS) Chief Administrator Haryana Urban Development Authority, Panchkula and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the respondents for not complying 09.7.2015 CWP-1708 State of Haryana and others” vide which the petition was disposed of with the following observation : COCP-1420-2016 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1420 of 2016 Date of decision : Delhi Fransalian Society through its Secretary Father Anil Versus Vikas Gupta (IAS) Chief Administrator Haryana Urban Development Authority, Panchkula and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Sunil Garg, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Balyan, Advocate with Mr. Vicky Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for not complying 09.7.2015 (Annexure P-1) passed by a Division 1708-2015 titled as “Delhi Fransalian Society, New Delhi vs. State of Haryana and others” vide which the petition was disposed of with the following observation :- “…..After hearing learned counsel for the parties, perusing the present petition and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, we dispose of the present petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed and 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1420 of 2016 (O & M) Date of decision :-02.09.2025 Delhi Fransalian Society through its Secretary Father Anil …..Petitioner Vikas Gupta (IAS) Chief Administrator Haryana Urban Development Authority, Panchkula and others …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Deepak Balyan, Advocate with Mr. Vicky Chauhan, Advocate Mr. Priyavrat Parashar, AAG, Haryana. Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for not complying the order dated Division Bench of this Court in Delhi Fransalian Society, New Delhi vs. State of Haryana and others” vide which the petition was disposed of After hearing learned counsel for the parties, perusing the present petition and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, we dispose of the present petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed and VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.03 20.46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document inclined to agree with the contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner, he seeks to withdraw the present contempt petition with liberty to take recourse to any other remedy available to him, as per law, if any. September 0 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-1420-2016 (O & M) comprehensive representation raising all the pleas as raised in the present writ petition before the appropriate authority. It is directed that in the event of a representation being filed by the petitioner within a period of two months from today, the same shall be decide with law by passing a speaking order and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of four months from the date of receipt of representation. The petitioner shall be entitled to lead any evidence to substantiate its claim before the concerned authority. It is, however, made clear that in case no such representation is filed within the stipulated period as noticed above, the interim order shall cease to operate, thereafter. After arguing for some time, whe inclined to agree with the contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner, he seeks to withdraw the present contempt petition with liberty to take recourse to any other remedy available to him, as per law, if any. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. September 02, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Reportable Yes / No 2 resentation raising all the pleas as raised in the present writ petition before the appropriate authority. It is directed that in the event of a representation being filed by the petitioner within a period of two months from today, the same shall be decided in accordance with law by passing a speaking order and after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of four months from the date of receipt of representation. The petitioner shall be entitled to lead any evidence to tiate its claim before the concerned authority. It is, however, made clear that in case no such representation is filed within the stipulated period as noticed above, the interim order shall cease to operate, thereafter.” After arguing for some time, when this Court was not inclined to agree with the contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner, he seeks to withdraw the present contempt petition with liberty to take recourse to any other remedy available to him, as per Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.03 20.46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document