Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98686 (ALL)

RAVINDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/33090/2025 · 2025-09-18

Anish Kumar Gupta, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33090 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. Heard Sri Ganga Dhar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Uttara Bahuguna, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Ms. Akriti Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Mrs. Anjali Upadhya, learned counsel for the Greater Noida Authority. 2. The petitioner herein claim allotment of 6% developed abadi land out of his acquired lands in Khasra No. 108 area 06 bigha 07 biswa 18 biswansi and Khasra No. 115 area 04 bigha 02 biswa 18 biswansi of Village Sakipur, Pargana-Dadri, Tehsil Sadar, District Gautam Budh Nagar, as per 65th Board meeting of Greater Noida Authority. Alternatively, it is prayed that the respondents be directed to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 29.7.2025. 3. The issue raised herein would require a factual enquiry. 4. Without entering into the merits of the case, we direct that the petitioner shall file a fresh representation before the respondent authority within two weeks from today along with a copy of this order and the respondent authority is under obligation to take an expeditious decision by passing a reasoned and speaking order strictly in accordance with law, preferably within a further period of six weeks. 5. The writ petition is disposed of, accordingly. September 19, 2025 Kirti Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ganga Dhar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anjali Upadhya, C.S.C. (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Ravindra Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SMT KIRTI MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad