IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.319 of 2025 Date of Decision: 01.05.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Dalip Singh ……...Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Virbahadur Verma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents-State. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record communication dated 30.04.2025, issued under the signatures of Director, School Education, Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that vide office order dated 27.03.2025, mandate contained in the judgment, alleged to have been violated, stands duly complied with. 2. Having perused office order dated 27.03.2025 annexed with the afore communication, which are taken on record, it clearly suggests that in terms of mandate contained in the judgment, alleged to have been violated, petitioner herein has been given regularization 2 from the date of his initial appointment. Besides above, he has also been released due and admissible benefits. 3. In view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law qua the surviving grievance, if any. Notice issued to the respondents are discharged. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. May 01, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Sunil) Judge