GAJENDRA CHANDRA KALITA v. SRI JISHNU BARUA AND 3 ORS.
Cont.Cas(C)/184/2022 · 2025-02-18
Soumitra Saikia
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9867 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9867 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010064252022
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/184/2022 GAJENDRA CHANDRA KALITA S/O- LATE HARESWAR KALITA, P.O. HEKERA, P.S. BOKO HEKERA, DIST.- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM VERSUS SRI JISHNU BARUA AND 3 ORS.
CHAIRMAN, ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED, BIJULEE BHAWAN, PALTANBAZAR, GUWAHATI-781008, KAMRUP'(M), ASSAM 2:SRI RAKESH KUMAR MANAGING DIRECTOR ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED BIJULEE BHAWAN PALTANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781008 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 3:TAPAN MAHANTA CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER RURAL ELECTRIFICATION ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED BIJULEE BHAWAN PALTANBAZAR GUWAHATI-781008 KAMRUP(M) ASSAM 4:PRANJAL MAHANTA SUB-MANAGER REVENUE BOKO ELECTRICAL SUB-DIVISION
Page No.# 2/2 ASSAM POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED BOKO KAMRUP(R) ASSAM-781123 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M K CHOUDHURY, MR P BHARDWAJ,MS MITALI SHARMA Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 19.02
.2025 Heard Mr. M. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S.P. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel for the APDCL. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed by the respondent authority and therefore, he does not wish to proceed in the contempt petition any further. Taking into consideration the submissions made at the bar, this Court is of the view that the proceeding need not be continued any further. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed. Notices issued stand recalled.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant