Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9866 (AP)

MALISETTI CHANDRAMOULI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/5786/2025 · 2025-04-04

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010109882025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 5786/2025 Between: 1. MALISETTI CHANDRAMOULI, S/O. LATE M. LAKSHI NARASAIAH, AGED 90 YEARS, R/O. MOGILICHARLA VILLAGE AND PANCHAYAT, LINGASAMUDRAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. SMT. MALISETTI VENKATA SURYA KUMARI,, W/O. LAKSHMI NARAYANA, AGED 49 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. MOGILICHARLA VILLAGE AND PANCHAYAT, LINGASAMUDRAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 3. SMT. MALISETTI LAKSHMI DORASANI,, W/O. M. KRISHNA RAO, AGED 42 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. MOGILICHARLA VILLAGE AND PANCHAYAT, LINGASAMUDRAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI. GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, LINGASAMUDRAM MANDAL, ERSTWHILE PRAKSAM DISTRICT, PRESENTLY SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, LINGASAMUDRAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 5. MOGILICHERLA GRAMPANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, MOGILICHARLA VILLAGE, LINGASAMUDRAM MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. T LAKSHMI NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. Mattegunta.Sudhir, Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps, M.P.Ps, Gram Panchayats THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER: Sri K.Ashok, Learned Counsel representing Sri T.Lakshmi Narayana, Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners has filed a letter in the Registry on 02.04.2025 seeking to withdraw this Writ Petition. This letter is taken on record. 2. Request is granted. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dated: 04.04.2025 M K K HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No: 5786 of 2025 Dated: 04.04.2025 M K K 71