138 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & Suraj Bhan Dilbagh Singh and others CORAM: Present: VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. Constitution of India P-3) passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Div.), which the objection filed by the petitioner dismissed and warra issued. 2. and seeing that this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, seeks to withdraw the present petition. 3. petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. September 08, 2025. Davinder Kumar IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & CHANDIGARH *** Suraj Bhan Versus Dilbagh Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Mr.Parveen Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner. VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) This is a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the order dated 21.08.2025 (Annexure 3) passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Div.), which the objection filed by the petitioner dismissed and warrants of possession qua the decre Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time seeing that this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, seeks to withdraw the present petition. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. September 08, 2025. Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-6225-2025 Date of decision : 08.09.2025 ... Petitioner ... Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Advocate for the petitioner. This is a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the for setting aside the order dated 21.08.2025 (Annexure 3) passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Div.), District Jhajjar, vide which the objection filed by the petitioner-defendant no.11 has been nts of possession qua the decretal property of JDs were Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time seeing that this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, seeks to In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Yes/No Date of decision : 08.09.2025 This is a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the for setting aside the order dated 21.08.2025 (Annexure District Jhajjar, vide defendant no.11 has been tal property of JDs were Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time seeing that this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, seeks to In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the Davinder Kumar 2025.09.08 14:24 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment