HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11387 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " i) kindly direct the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), First, Jaunpur to decide the petitioner/plaintiff's application 6-C in Suit No. 89 of 2020 (Sarita Devi Vs. Ramraj and another) as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 3 months" 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 2020 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), First, Jaunpur to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Sarita Devi .....Petitioner(s) Ramraj And Another .....Respondent(s) expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 19, 2025 Nitika Sri. A227 No. 11387 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad