Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9865 (UTT)

CHINDARO KAUR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/869/2024 · 2025-04-09

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.869 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. B.S. Koranga, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Vikas Kumar Guglani, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, D.A.G. for the State. 3. It is contended by learned State counsel that on 09.12.2024 notice under Section 35(3) of B.N.S.S. 2023 has been served upon the petitioner. 4. Since the offence alleged against the petitioner is punishable maximum to seven years, and notice has already been served upon the petitioner, therefore, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. 5. Accordingly the present writ petition stands disposed-off. 6. Pending applications, if any, also stands disposed-off. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 09.04.2025 SK