110 CRWP-9757-2025 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-9757-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.09.2025 RAJESHWARI AND ANR. ….Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL Present:- Mr. Monu Sharma, Advocate for the petitioners. ..… RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL) CRM-W-1303-2025 This is an application filed under Rule 3-A(I) Chapter VI Part B, Vol V of the High Court Rules and Orders for grant of leave to file the present petition. For the reasons mentioned in the application, same is allowed as prayed for. Main Case 1. The petitioners have filed the instant petition with a prayer to direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and also directing the respondents No.4 and 5 not to interfere in their lives and liberty. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already submitted a representation dated 02.09.2025 (Annexure P-5) to the Superintendent of Police, Narnaul, District Puneet Sharma 2025.09.08 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment 110 CRWP-9757-2025 (O&M) -2- Mahendergarh and they shall be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2 to look into their representation dated 02.09.2025 (Annexure P-5). 2. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3, at this stage. 3. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG Haryana, who is present in the Court accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. In view of the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing anything on the merits and claim of the parties, respondent No.2–The Superintendent of Police, Narnaul, District Mahendergarh is directed to depute a senior officer to look into the representation dated 02.09.2025 (Annexure P-5) and after seeking a report, he may pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law. This order shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the validity of the marriage of the parties. The parties mentioned in the petition or any other person mentioned in the petition shall be at liberty to take recourse to appropriate law, if any. 5. With these observations, this petition is disposed of. (RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 08.09.2025 JUDGE puneet i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No Puneet Sharma 2025.09.08 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment