HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14178 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Sarveshwar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ram Chandra holding brief of Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned Counsel for the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for sometime fairly submits that in order to challenge the calculation of backwages, it will be better that the petitioner files an application for clarification/modification in Writ-C No. 2 of 2009 which was allowed vide order dated 28.7.2022 with a direction to pay 25% of backwages for the entire duration from the date of his disengagement to the date of attaining the age of superannuation. 3. Writ Petition is disposed of. September 19, 2025 SB Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sarveshwar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Pranjal Mehrotra (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Dilip Kumar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) U.P. State Bridge Corporation Ltd. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad