Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98607 (PAT)

Ramawati Devi v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./60109/2025 · 2025-09-22

Alok Kumar Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60109 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2025 Thana- JANTA BAZAR District- Saran ====================================================== Ramawati Devi W/o- Radha Chaudhary Resident of village- Tajpur Police station- Janta bazar District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mili Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 22-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Janta Bazar P.S. Case No 116 of 2025. registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. As per prosecution case, 5 litre country made liquor was recovered from the house of the petitioner. Local chowkidar disclosed the name of the petitioner who fled away from the place of occurrence. It is further alleged that 20 litre country made liquor was recovered from the house of co-accused Rajesh Nut. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60109 of 2025(2) dt.22-09-2025 2/3 that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged in the FIR and she has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that alleged recovery was made from the front of open door of the petitioner and the place of recovery is an open place which is accessible to all and petitioner cannot be held liable for the alleged recovery. Petitioner bears criminal antecedent of one case in which he is on bail. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Seizure list has not been prepared as per law. 5. The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, argument advanced on behalf of both sides and also taking into consideration the material available on record, the petitioner above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Exclusive Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60109 of 2025(2) dt.22-09-2025 3/3 Special Excise Judge-03, Saran at Chapra in connection with Janta Bazar P.S. Case No. 116 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S. vashudha/- (Alok Kumar Pandey, J) U T