Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98603 (ALL)

BHUPENDRA PRATAP SINGH v. RAJ KUMAR AND 20 OTHERS

A227/11438/2025 · 2025-09-21

Manish Kumar Nigam

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11438 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " 1-To direct learned Civil Judge (J.D.) Shahar, Varanasi to decide the application 6C of Original Suit No.734 of 2025 (Raj Kumar and others Vs. Akhilesh Kumar and others) within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending since 2025 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Shahar, Varanasi to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Misra, Neeraj Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) Raj Kumar And 20 Others .....Respondent(s) concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 22, 2025 S. Singh A227 No. 11438 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAVITA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad