SOMDATT v. JOINT DIRECTOR GOVERNMENT PRESS ROORKEE
WPMS/1593/2014 · 2025-06-06
Ashish Naithani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 986 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 986 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPMS No.1593 of 2014 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
None present for the petitioner.
2. Mr. G.S. Negi, learned DAG for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. The matter relates back to the year 2014. As per the record of file, it is evident that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner on several occasions. Here is the details when there is no representation on behalf of petitioner:- (1) On 08.03.2016, the matter is adjourned on the request of Ms. Sheetal Selwal, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. A.K. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. (2) On 01.07.2024, there is no representation for the petitioner. (3) On 08.05.2025, there is no representation for the petitioner. (4) On 23.05.2025, there is no representation for the petitioner.
4.
As per the above record/order-sheet, it seems that the petitioner does not want to press the writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Ashish Naithani, J)
06.06.2025 Nitesh/