Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98595 (PNJ)

S K PRUTHI AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/28696/2024 · 2025-01-17

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

105 IN T S.K. Pruthi and State of Haryana CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. K *** TRIBHUVAN D CM No.307 of 20 2. of hearing of the m Main Case the instant petitio revision of pay judgment dated 1 titled K.L. Vasude has attained finali v. K.L. Vasudeva IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH CWP-28696-2024 Date of Decision nd others Versus ryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBH Mr. Rajbir Singh Kadian, Advocate f Mr. Krishan K. Chahal, Additional A *** AN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) 2025 Application is allowed. For the reasons stated in the appl f the main case is advanced to today i Learned counsel for the petitioner petition is for re-fixation of the petitio pay-scales. The issue stands decide ated 16.05.2023 rendered in Civil W sudeva and others v. State of Harya finality as LPA No.1960 of 2023 title eva and others, filed against it, also NJAB AND HARYANA 2024 (O&M) cision : 17.01.2025 …Petitioners ….Respondents RIBHUVAN DAHIYA ocate for the petitioner(s). ional Advocate General, Haryana. e application, it is allowed. The date oday itself, and is taken on Board. itioners contends that claim raised in petitioners’ pension on the basis of decided in petitioners’ favour vide ivil Writ Petition No.26015 of 2013 aryana and another. The judgment 23 titled State of Haryana and others t, also stands dismissed. date n is of vide 2013 ment ers PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.01.20 14:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-28696-2024 2. considered as pe hereinabove, and due benefits, as f thereafter. 3. counsel for the pe terms thereof. 4. 5. officer concerned January 17, 2025 ps 2024 (O&M) -2- Learned State counsel contends th as per law laid down by this Court e, and an appropriate order will be pa s, as found admissible, will be releas In view of the statement made by the petitioners has no objection to the Ordered accordingly. In case the order is not passed w cerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to th , 2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable ends that the petitioners’ case will be Court in the judgments mentioned l be passed within two months. The released to them within two weeks ade by learned State counsel, learned to the petition being disposed of in sed within the stipulated period, the 0 to the petitioners. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No ill be oned The eeks rned of in , the YA) PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.01.20 14:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document