Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14223 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
1. Learned counsel for petitioner is not present.
2. Heard Sri Anadi Krishna Narayana, learned counsel for respondent.
3. Learned counsel for respondent submits that there may be a legal impediment to consider the claim of petitioner for compassionate appointment, which is filed after as many as 17 years, still the claim of petitioner will be considered and a reasoned order will convey to him in accordance with law.
4. Taking note of above submissions, even in absence of counsel for petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of. September 19, 2025 P. Pandey Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Wahid Jamal Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anadi Krishna Narayana, C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Nafees Khan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PUSHPENDRA PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad