Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98577 (ALL)

PRATIBHA v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/32940/2025 · 2025-10-07

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32940 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Mohammad Faisal Khan, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ram Kumar Verma, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail during the trial in Case Crime No. 183 of 2025, under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 352 B.N.S., Police Station- Titavi, District Muzaffar Nagar. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that in the FIR general allegations have been made against the six accused persons and the FIR was lodged after two days of the incident. It is further submitted that all the witnesses have assigned role for causing injury to co-accused Dhiraj, no role has been assigned to cause injury to the applicant. He further submitted that the applicant is lady and she is languishing in jail since 19.08.2025 having no criminal history. In case, she is granted bail, she will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the fact that no specific role has been assigned to the applicant for causing injuries to any of the injured. 5. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and taking into account the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohammad Faisal Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Pratibha .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) fact that the applicant is lady and no role has been assigned for causing injuries and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. 6. Let the applicant- Pratibha involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on her furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. October 8, 2025 A.Kr. BAIL No. 32940 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- AJAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad