Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98565 (ALL)

LALITA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 15 OTHERS

NA528/36350/2025 · 2025-09-25

Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 36350 of 2025 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Heard Sri J.L. Yadava, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Vijay Bahadur Yadav, Advocate, holding brief of Sri R.D. Yadav, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and Sri B.P. Singh, learned AGA for the State. 2. Present application under section 528 BNSS has been preferred seeking direction to the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 22, Azamgarh to take cognizance and summon the opposite party no.2 to 16 in relevant sections in Case Crime No 18 of 2025, P.S. Deedar Ganj, District Azamgarh. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has lodged the present FIR against 15 persons but after investigation, chargesheet has been filed against four persons only. It is further submitted that the Investigating Officer has not conducted proper investigation in the matter. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned AGA submit that remedy regarding the prayer sought by the applicant lied with the concerned Magistrate. 5. In view of the above, the present application is disposed of with the observation that the applicant may raise her grievance regarding improper investigation of the case before the learned Magistrate. September 26, 2025 Madhurima Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amar Singh Yadav, Jawahar Lal Yadava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ram Dular Yadav (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Lalita .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 15 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MADHURIMA GARG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad