CR-6317-2025 (O&M) -:1:- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (119) CR-6317-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:-10.09.2025 MANOJ ALIAS MANOJ KUMAR AND ANOTHER … Petitioners Versus POONAM ... Respondent **** CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- Ms. Tanya Vashist, Advocate for Mr. S.S. Nain, Advocate for the petitioner. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral) 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that she does not wish to press the present revision petition on merits. However, a request has been made that the learned First Appellate Court may be directed to decide the pending appeal in a time-bound manner. 2. Having regard to the fact that the dispute pertains to specific performance of a contract, and keeping in view that such contracts are required to be expeditiously performed with due expedition, the learned Additional District Judge is directed to dispose of the appeal within a period of one year from the next date fixed before the learned Appellate Court. 3. Since the main case has been decided, pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands also disposed of. ( VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 10.09.2025 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No GAURAV SOROT 2025.09.10 16:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document