CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS v. NANU RAM AND ANOTHER
CWP/26709/2025 · 2025-09-09
Harsimran Singh Sethi, Vikas Suri
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98536 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 98536 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 106 CWP-26709-2025 (O&M) Decided on : 09.09.2025 CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION AND OTHERS . .Appellants Versus NANU RAM AND ANOTHER
. . . Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI PRESENT: Ms. Madhu Dayal, Advocate and Ms. Sukhmani T. Patwalia, Advocate for the appellants. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral) After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the appellants submits that the present appeal may kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further with liberty to file a review before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, Chandigarh keeping in view of the judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No. 5689-5690 of 2021 titled as ‘Union of India and others versus Ilmo Devi and another’, 2021 (4) SCT 312, copy of the said judgment is annexed as Annexure P-4. Ordered accordingly. Pending civil miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
(HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE ( VIKAS SURI ) JUDGE 09.09.2025 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RIYA 2025.09.09 17:23 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document