Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98533 (PNJ)

BALRAJ SINGH v. BHAJAN SINGH AND OTHERS

CR/6190/2025 · 2025-09-08

Vikas Bahl

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

137 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & Balraj Singh Bhajan Singh and others CORAM: Present: VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. Constitution of India (Annexure P which the warrants of attachment of property of the petitioner debtor has been issued. 2. and seeing that this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, seeks to withdraw the present petition. 3. petitioner, the present petition is dismis September 08, 2025. Davinder Kumar IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & CHANDIGARH *** Balraj Singh Versus Bhajan Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Mr.Tanvir Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner. VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) This is a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated 11.08.2025 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Civil Judge (SrDiv.), Sri Muktsar Sahib, vide which the warrants of attachment of property of the petitioner debtor has been issued. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time and seeing that this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, seeks to withdraw the present petition. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. September 08, 2025. Davinder Kumar Whether speaking / reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-6190-2025 Date of decision : 08.09.2025 ... Petitioner ... Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL This is a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the for setting aside the impugned order dated 11.08.2025 4) passed by the Civil Judge (SrDiv.), Sri Muktsar Sahib, vide which the warrants of attachment of property of the petitioner- judgment petitioner, after arguing for some time and seeing that this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, seeks to In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the sed as withdrawn. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Yes/No Date of decision : 08.09.2025 This is a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the for setting aside the impugned order dated 11.08.2025 4) passed by the Civil Judge (SrDiv.), Sri Muktsar Sahib, vide judgment petitioner, after arguing for some time and seeing that this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, seeks to In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the Davinder Kumar 2025.09.08 14:24 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order / judgment