Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9853 (JK)

MOHD RASHID v. U T OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY REVENUE DEPTT AND OTHERS

WP(C)/1562/2023 · 2025-10-29

Rahul Bharti

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 1562/2023 Mohd. Rashid …..Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Gupta, Advocate. Vs UT of J&K & Ors. .….Respondents Through: Ms. Nazia Fazal, Assisting Counsel vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER (29.10.2025) 01. Mr. Aditya Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner is reported to have expired to the best of his information, but till date none of the legal heir(s)/representative(s) of the deceased petitioner has/have approached him with respect to carrying forward the litigation. 02. On account of death of the petitioner, the petition is consigned to record, with liberty reserved in favour of the legal heir(s)/representative(s) of the deceased petitioner to seek revival in case any application to that effect is made within a period of six months from the date of passing of this order. 03. The present petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non- prosecution along with connected application(s). 04. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU 29.10.2025 Bunty Serial No. 14 Bunty Kumar 2025.10.31 11:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Jammu