APHC010109752025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 6411/2025 Between: Smt. Garikapati Suseela ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GUDISEVA VENKATA SAI KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER: 1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:- “to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the inaction of the respondents in disposing the revision petition filed by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principals of natural justice and Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to dispose the Revision Petition preferred by the petitioner before the Joint Collector Ananthapuram / 4th respondent against the Order Dated 07.07.2017 bearing R.Dis/ 1134/2016/k by the 6th respondent / RDO Kadiri which has been pending since 2017 in accordance with law without any further delay and pass such other order. 2 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring to an extent of Ac.5.00 cents in Sy.No.235-1 of Kappalabanda Village, Puttaparthi Mandal, Ananthapuram District, and was granted D-Patta dated 18.06.2006. However, certain individuals preferred an appeal before the 6th respondent/Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO) seeking cancellation of the pattadar passbook issued in favor of the petitioner. After conducting an inquiry, the 6th respondent/RDO passed an order dated 07.07.2017, setting aside the assignment made in favor of the petitioner. Aggrieved by this order, the petitioner filed a revision petition before the Joint Collector/4th respondent. Furthermore, the 2nd respondent/Collector directed the 6th respondent/RDO to send the relevant revenue records to the Joint Collector for necessary action. However, despite the lapse of more than seven years, the respondent authorities have neither taken any action nor disposed of the revision petition. Hence, the present Writ Petition. 3. The learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents submits that the respondent authority will consider the revision petition filed by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, within a reasonable time. 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. 3 5. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents and on perusal of the material placed on record, this Court is of the considered opinion that the present Writ Petition can be disposed of by directing the respondents authorities to dispose of the revision petition in accordance with law, within a period of four (04) months from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 18.03.2025 kkllkk 4 432 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 6411 of 2025 18.03.2025 kkllkk 5