Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 98511 (PNJ)

VEENA RANI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/9721/2025 · 2025-09-08

Surya Partap Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-9721 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 111 VEENA RANI STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PRATAP SINGH 1. directions to the respondent 2. the petitioners have filed a representation dated before the respondent No.2 stipulated time. 3. 9721-2025 (O&M) 8587 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH RANI & ANR. VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PRATAP SINGH Mr. Varun Aggarwal, Advocate Ms. Kriteka Sheokand, Advocate for SURYA PRATAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners fo directions to the respondents No.2 to 4 to respondents No.10 and 11. The learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed a representation dated the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for directions to respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. Notice of motion to the respondents No.1 to 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-9721-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 08.09.202 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PRATAP SINGH , Advocate for Ms. Kriteka Sheokand, Advocate for the petitioners. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners fo to protect their life and liberty from earned counsel representing the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed a representation dated 08.07.2025 (Annexure P earned counsel prays for directions to to decide the abovementioned representation within a respondents No.1 to 9 only. (O&M) .2025 .....PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENTS The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners for from earned counsel representing the petitioners submits that (Annexure P-5) earned counsel prays for directions to the to decide the abovementioned representation within a GAURAV THAKUR 2025.09.09 13:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-9721 5. disposing of the representation the respondent No.2 and accordingly 6. hereby disposed of with a direction to speaking order and P-5) within a period of 15 days from order. It is safety and securi clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners. The police authority of District shall be at liberty to make perception adequate security to the Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 9721-2025 (O&M) 8587 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a direction for disposing of the representation of the petitioner respondent No.2 and that the instant writ petition be disposed of accordingly. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to speaking order and decide the representation ) within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant It is further directed that the petitioners safety and security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners. The police authority of District shall be at liberty to make an independent perception to the petitioners, and take a decision security to them. Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a direction for of the petitioners (Annexure P-5) be given to the instant writ petition be disposed of Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to pass a decide the representation of the petitioners (Annexure the date of receipt of copy of instant directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisite their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners. The police authority of District Bathinda independent assessment of the threat and take a decision on the issue of providing :Yes/No : Yes/No Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that a direction for ) be given to the instant writ petition be disposed of Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is pass a (Annexure the date of receipt of copy of instant requisite however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to Bathinda threat providing GAURAV THAKUR 2025.09.09 13:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document