APHC010109612020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Chevuri Sarojanamma The State of Andhra Pradesh and Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Jada Sravan Kumar Counsel for the Respondent 1. GP for Revenue (AP) The Court made the following order: Challenging the action of the respondent with the petitioner’s possession and enjoyment of extent of Ac.1.15 cents in Sy.No.1719/4 at Anandapuram Village of Kandukur Mandal, Prakasam District, the presen 2. Heard Sri Jada Sravan Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 6756/2020 ... AND f Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following order: Challenging the action of the respondent’s unauthorized interference with the petitioner’s possession and enjoyment of agricultural lands in extent of Ac.1.15 cents in Sy.No.1719/4 at Anandapuram Village of Kandukur Mandal, Prakasam District, the present writ petition is filed. Jada Sravan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3458] THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA ...Petitioner Respondents s unauthorized interference agricultural lands in an extent of Ac.1.15 cents in Sy.No.1719/4 at Anandapuram Village of Kandukur learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the 3. It is contended by the petitioner that the 4th respondent has assigned land in an extent of Ac.1.15 cents in Sy.No.1719/4 of Anandapuram village, Kandakuru Mandal, Prakasam District, and that the petitioner has been in occupation and possession of the same, and has been cultivating the same since the date of allotment. However, on account of issuance of house site pattas in favour of the beneficiaries of the scheme launched by the Government of Andhra Pradesh viz., "Navaratnallu Pedalandariki Illu", the revenue officials have asked the petitioner to vacate the subject land. 4. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue has placed on record a copy of the written instructions received from the 4th respondent-Tahsildar, dated 04.11.2024. A perusal of the same reveals that the DKT Patta alleged to have been issued in favor of the petitioner is not traceable in the records, and that the petitioner's name is also not recorded as a pattadar in the revenue records with respect to the subject land. It is further stated that the subject land is not proposed for issuance of house site pattas, as it is found in the list of prohibited properties under Section 22-A(1)(b) of the Registration Act, 1908. 5. Having regard to the contentions advanced, in the circumstances of the case, this Court is of the considered view that any action proposed against the petitioner shall be only after issuing notice to the petitioner and affording him a due opportunity to present his case. Till passing of such order, the petitioner shall not be dispossessed of the subject land. 6. The written instructions of the 4th respondent-Tahsildar, dated 04.11.2024 are placed on record. 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date: 20.01.2025 BSK 148 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 6756/2020 Date: 20.01.2025 BSK