Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14196 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is aggrieved by the order of transfer dated 04.04.2025 and the plea taken is that three times in a year, he has been transferred.
3. Learned Standing counsel submits that he has been transferred within the district hence he may not have any grievance however he is not averse to the petitioner's representation being directed to be decided by the concerned competent respondent in a time bound period and in accordance with law provided petitioner makes a fresh representation. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Kuamr Yadav, Siddhartha Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Baliram .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with direction to the petitioner to make a fresh representation regarding his claim before competent respondent authority within a period of two weeks, the same shall be looked into and considered and also disposed of as expeditiously as possible preferably within a further period of six weeks.
5. Needless to add order to be passed shall be reasoned and speaking one.
September 19, 2025 Deepika WRIA No. 14196 of 2025 2 (Ajit Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- DEEPIKA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad