Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 985 (UTT)

HITESH KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/54/2022 · 2025-08-18

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.54 of 2022 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Shakti Saurabh Purohit, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Piyush Garg, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. State counsel, on instructions, which are taken on record, submitted that after investigation a charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioners, which is not disputed by counsel for the petitioners. 4. In view of the submission made by counsel for the parties, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous; however it is open to the petitioners to challenge the said charge sheet before appropriate forum under appropriate provision of law. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 18.08.2025 SK