NAJIM UDDIN MONDAL AND ANR v. MD ABDUL HANNAN MONDAL AND ORS
CO/479/2025 · 2025-03-11
Hiranmay Bhattacharyya
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9848 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9848 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
M/L- 83 11/03/2025 Ct. No.-6 Aritra C.O. 479 of 2025
Najim Uddin Mondal & Anr. Versus Md. Abdul Hannan Mondal & Ors.
Mr. Benazir Shaikh
…for the petitioner
After some argument the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the order impugned is appealable under the provisions of Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure. He prayed for leave to withdraw this application with liberty to approach the appropriate forum. In the light of the submissions made by the learned advocate for the petitioner CO 479 of 2025 stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum in accordance with law. The learned advocate on record for the petitioner is permitted to take back the certified copy of the order impugned by replacing the same with a photostat copy thereof. There will be no order as to costs. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)