IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36519 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2025 Thana- Champanagar District- Purnia ====================================================== 1. Md. Shamim Alam @ Md. Shamim son of Late Md. Jainuddin Resident of Mohammadpur, P.S.- Champa Nagar, Gokhupur, District- Purnia 2. Md. Gulfraz @ Md. Gulfraz Alam son of Md. Shamim alam Resident of Mohammadpur, P.S.- Champa Nagar, Gokhupur, District- Purnia 3. Md. Shahariyar @ Md. Shaharifar Alam Son of Md. shamim Alam Resident of Mohammadpur, P.S.- Champa Nagar, Gokhupur, District- Purnia ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Syed Firoz Raza, Sr. Advocate Mr. Hasnain Haider, Advocate Mr. Azhar Hussain, Advocate For the State : Md. Aslam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 4 25-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Champa Nagar P.S. Case No. 18 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109, 76, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the BNS. 3. As per allegation, the petitioners assaulted the informant and his mother with sword, fist and lathi due to which they got injured. It is further alleged that they snatched Rs. 20,000/- from informant’s pocket and threatened them to burn alive. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioners has Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36519 of 2025(4) dt.25-11-2025 2/2 submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. They are the persons of clean antecedent. It has further been submitted that final opinion of the doctor shows that injuries are simple in nature which is clear from page-12 of the case diary. It has also submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties. 5. On the other hand, learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. 6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks before the learned court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge- XV, Purnea in connection with Champa Nagar P.S. Case No. 18 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C./ 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023. priyanka/- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U T