IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 125 CWP-26444-2025 Date of Decision: 17.09.2025 Mange Ram …Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. Himalya Makkad, Advocate for the petitioner (through Video Conferencing) Mr. Amit Sahni, Additional Advocate General, Haryana TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant extension in service to the petitioner up to sixty years of age on account of being more than seventy per cent disabled. 2. Learned State counsel contends that the extension has been granted to the petitioner to remain in service up to sixty years of age, vide order dated 16.09.2025. 3. In view thereof, the petition has been rendered infructuous, and disposed of accordingly. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 17.09.2025 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2025.09.19 09:14 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment