Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9845 (JHR)

LAKHI PANDIT v. STATE OF JHARKHAND And ORS

WPC/6413/2009 · 2025-01-15

Rajesh Shankar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6413 of 2009 Lakhi Pandit son of Late Jhabu Pandit, resident of Village- Jamuniatanr, P.O.- Punashi, P.S. – Jasidih, District- Deoghar … … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 2. The Commissioner, Santhal Pargana Division, Dumka 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Deoghar 5. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Deoghar 6. The Secretary, Distruct Bhudan Yagna Office, Deoghar 7. Jagdish Thakur 8. Barat Thakur 9. Sukdeo Thakur 10. Sahdeo Thakur 11. Kishun Thakur Resp. Nos. 7 to 11 are sons of Late Sarju Thakur @ Khargu Thakur, residents of Village- Jamuniatanr, P.O.- Punashi, P.S.- Jasidih, District- Deoghar …. … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Mr. Prashant Kumar Rai, A.C. to S.C. (L&C)-I ---- 13/15.01.2025 Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that in view of the statements made in paragraphs 15 to 21 of the supplementary counter affidavit dated 29.08.2022 filed on behalf of the Commissioner, Santhal Pargana Division, Dumka (the respondent no. 2), the present writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Considering the said submission, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Ritesh