Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9845 (GAU)

MINTU KALITA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/700/2025 · 2025-05-01

Mridul Kumar Kalita

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010063952025 2025:GAU-AS:5458 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/700/2025 MINTU KALITA S/O- DHANESWAR KALITA R/O PALMGROVE ENCLAVE, FLAT NO. 302,3RD FLOOR, JURIPAR PATH, PANJABARI,P.O. PANJABARI, P.S. SATGAON GUWAHATI-781037, DIST. KAMRUP (METRO), ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. S BHUYAN, MR P DOLEY,MR J SINGH Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 02.05.2025 1. Heard Mr. H. Agarwala, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. M.P. Goswami, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor Page No.# 2/2 appearing for the State of Assam. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was granted interim anticipatory bail by this Court, by order dated 26.03.2025, and in pursuant to the directions of this Court, the petitioner has appeared and has co-operated in the investigation. 3. On the other hand, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced the Case Diary of Satgaon P.S. Case No. 53/ 2025 and has submitted that the petitioner has appeared before the Investigating Officer and his statement has been recorded. 4. In view of the fact that the petitioner has complied with the directions of this Court and has co-operated in the investigation, the interim anticipatory bail granted to him, by order dated 26.03.2025 is hereby made absolute, with condition Nos. (ii),(iii) and (iv) attached to the said order, remaining intact. 5. This anticipatory bail application is accordingly disposed of. 6. Send back the Case Diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant